Why Parents Should Update Their Estate Plan Every 3–5 Years
Creating an estate plan is one of the most important steps a parent can take. But it is not a one-time event. The plan you signed when your children were infants may contain guardians who have since moved, trustees who are no longer appropriate, trust distribution terms that don’t fit your children’s current ages, and asset inventories that bear little resemblance to what you own today. A stale estate plan can be nearly as dangerous as having no plan at all — because it creates false confidence while leaving real gaps. This guide covers the eight most important reasons parents need to review and update their plans regularly, the events that require an immediate update, and a self-audit checklist you can use to assess your own plan right now.
An estate plan is a snapshot of your family, your assets, and the law at the moment it was created. All three change continuously. Your family grows and evolves. Your assets appreciate, shift, and expand. Laws affecting estate taxes, retirement accounts, and trust administration change — sometimes dramatically — without any notice to you.
The 3–5 year review cadence exists because most families experience at least one significant change in every 3–5 year window that warrants revisiting the plan. For families with young children, the changes often come faster than that — and the consequences of outdated documents are most severe precisely when families are youngest and most financially exposed.
Eight Reasons Your Estate Plan Needs a Regular Review
The most obvious trigger for an estate plan update is a change in your family structure. Guardians and trustees named years ago may no longer be the right choices — due to their own life changes, geographic moves, health developments, or shifts in your relationship with them. New children or adoptions create beneficiaries who aren’t named in existing documents.
- Birth or adoption of additional children — new children may not be included in existing trust distributions if not explicitly added; some trusts cover “children born or adopted after” automatically while others do not — your attorney should verify which applies to your trust
- Divorce or remarriage — your own or your named guardian’s; a guardian who is divorced may have a different living situation, new stepchildren, or changed financial circumstances that affect the suitability of their nomination
- Death or incapacity of a named guardian or trustee — if your first-choice guardian dies and you have no backup named, Missouri law defaults to whoever petitions the court
- Estrangement or relationship changes — a guardian or trustee you trusted deeply five years ago may no longer be someone you would choose today; your plan should reflect your current relationships, not historical ones
- Guardian’s own major life changes — a new marriage, a cross-country move, a serious illness, or a significant financial reversal can all affect whether the person remains the right choice to raise your children
For a full guide on selecting and updating guardian nominations, see: How to Choose Guardians for Your Children Without Hurting Anyone’s Feelings
Trust provisions written when your children were infants or toddlers are almost always worth revisiting as they grow. A distribution age that made sense at the time may no longer feel right. Education funding terms drafted before you had a sense of your children’s interests and abilities may need refinement. As children move from childhood into adolescence and early adulthood, many parents find their views on inheritance management evolve significantly.
- Distribution ages — many parents initially set ages like 25, 30, and 35, then find as children approach those ages that they want to adjust them based on how their children are actually developing financially and personally
- Education funding terms — a trust drafted when your child was two may not contemplate private school, trade school, graduate programs, or gap years; updating the terms to reflect your current wishes prevents disputes about what the trustee is authorized to distribute
- Incentive provisions — some parents add provisions tying distributions to educational achievement, employment, sobriety, or other milestones as children mature; these are difficult to draft in the abstract for a newborn but become very specific and meaningful when children are teenagers
- Substance abuse protections — if a child has developed substance abuse issues, updating the trust to include spendthrift provisions and conditions on distribution protects the inheritance without disinheriting the child
- Special needs adjustments — a child diagnosed with a disability after the trust was created may need a special needs sub-trust added to protect government benefit eligibility
For more on children’s trust planning: If You Have Kids, You Need a Trust — Here’s Why
Estate plans drafted when a family’s net worth was modest may not contain the planning structures needed once wealth grows substantially. The plan that was perfectly appropriate at $300,000 in net worth may be inadequate at $1.5 million — or need significant restructuring above the federal estate tax exemption threshold.
- Real estate purchases — each new property should be transferred into the trust; properties acquired since the trust was created may never have been funded in
- Business formation or acquisition — business interests are among the most valuable and most frequently overlooked assets in trust funding; if you’ve started or acquired a business since your plan was created, the business interest may not be in the trust
- Investment growth past the federal estate tax exemption — the current federal exemption is historically elevated (approximately $13.6 million per person in 2024) but is scheduled to sunset at the end of 2025 to roughly half that amount, absent Congressional action; families whose estates are approaching the post-sunset threshold should be reviewing their plans now
- Inheritance receipts — if you’ve inherited assets since creating your plan, those assets need to be evaluated for trust funding and the plan may need structural updates
- Life insurance coverage changes — policies added, cancelled, or changed in ownership since the plan was created may not coordinate properly with the trust’s beneficiary structure
Even a perfectly drafted and initially well-funded trust becomes partially unfunded over time if no one actively maintains it. This is one of the most common — and most consequential — problems that a periodic estate plan review uncovers. Assets that drift outside the trust reintroduce the probate exposure the trust was designed to eliminate.
- New bank and investment accounts opened for convenience outside the trust — often for a specific purpose (“we just needed a quick account”) and never retitled
- Newly purchased real estate — property acquired since trust creation may have been titled individually at closing if the title company or real estate attorney wasn’t instructed to use the trust
- Refinancing transactions — lenders often require property to be temporarily deeded out of the trust during a refinance; the property must be re-deeded back in after closing, and many homeowners don’t know this happened or assume the lender handled it
- Business interests never assigned — a new LLC or business interest formed after the trust was created may be sitting in individual name with no assignment to the trust ever completed
- Digital assets added but not planned for — cryptocurrency, online business revenue, and monetized platforms acquired in recent years may have no funding or access plan at all
See: How to Properly Fund Your Trust: The Definitive Handbook and Why Most Trusts Fail: The Shocking Truth About Unfunded Trusts
Beneficiary designations on retirement accounts, life insurance policies, annuities, and financial accounts are among the most powerful documents in an estate plan — and among the most commonly neglected. They operate completely independently of the will and trust: a beneficiary designation overrides everything the trust says about that asset. An outdated designation can redirect hundreds of thousands of dollars to the wrong person with no ability to correct it after death.
- Ex-spouses still named as beneficiary — divorce does not automatically revoke a beneficiary designation in Missouri; a former spouse named on a life insurance policy or IRA may still receive those assets at your death if the designation was never updated
- Deceased beneficiaries — if a named primary beneficiary has died and no contingent beneficiary was named (or the contingent beneficiary is also deceased), the asset may default to your estate and pass through probate
- Minor children named directly — naming a minor child as beneficiary of a life insurance policy or retirement account triggers a court-appointed conservatorship, exactly as if there were no plan at all; the trust should be the named beneficiary for assets intended to benefit minor children
- Retirement accounts misaligned with trust planning — if your trust has changed its distribution structure or if SECURE Act rules have shifted the planning calculus for your beneficiaries, the retirement account beneficiary designations may no longer coordinate properly
- Missing contingent beneficiaries — a common and easily corrected gap; if the primary beneficiary cannot receive the asset (because they predeceased you, disclaim, or are otherwise unable to receive), a missing contingent beneficiary forces the asset into probate
Federal and state tax laws affecting estates, trusts, and retirement accounts have changed significantly in recent years, and more significant changes are scheduled. A plan drafted under prior law may not take advantage of current opportunities — or may inadvertently trigger adverse consequences under new rules.
- SECURE Act and SECURE 2.0 — the Setting Every Community Up for Retirement Enhancement Act (2019) and its 2022 successor fundamentally changed inherited IRA distribution rules. The “stretch IRA” for most non-spouse beneficiaries was eliminated; most beneficiaries must now distribute inherited IRAs within 10 years. Trusts named as IRA beneficiaries must be reviewed to confirm they comply with current rules or risk accelerated distributions and tax consequences
- Missouri-specific law changes — Missouri’s Electronic Wills and Trust Signing Act (effective August 28, 2025) changed execution requirements for electronic estate planning documents; plans signed electronically before this date may have been signed under prior rules and should be reviewed for compliance
- Step-up in basis planning — changes in the treatment of capital gains at death affect whether certain assets are better held in a revocable trust versus other structures; this analysis changes as law changes and as asset values change
Five years ago, many families had minimal digital assets worth planning for. Today, the digital estate has expanded dramatically — and most older estate plans contain either no digital asset provisions at all, or provisions drafted before the current landscape existed.
- Cryptocurrency and NFTs — the value and complexity of digital currency holdings have grown substantially; a plan that doesn’t address private key management and fiduciary access may leave these assets inaccessible to your successor trustee entirely
- Online businesses and monetized content — a profitable website, YouTube channel, Etsy shop, or content subscription business is a real business asset that needs to be included in business succession planning and trust funding
- Financial apps and investment platforms — Robinhood, Coinbase, PayPal balances, Venmo accounts, and similar platforms may hold significant value with no beneficiary designation mechanism available on the platform
- Cloud storage and professional accounts — valuable creative work, business records, and intellectual property stored in cloud accounts needs access provisions and clear instructions for fiduciaries
- Fiduciary access authorization — Missouri adopted the Revised Uniform Fiduciary Access to Digital Assets Act (RUFADAA); your trust and powers of attorney should expressly authorize the trustee and agent to access digital accounts, or platforms may refuse to grant access even to your successor trustee
See: Digital Assets & Passwords: Protecting Your Online Life in Your Estate Plan
Estate planning documents are generally governed by the law of the state where they were executed or where the grantor is domiciled — and the rules differ meaningfully across states. A move from Missouri to another state (or to Missouri from another state) warrants a review of whether existing documents remain valid and optimally structured.
- Will execution requirements vary by state — a will valid in Missouri may or may not satisfy the execution requirements of another state, though most states recognize wills that were validly executed in the state where they were signed
- Power of attorney statutes differ — some states use standardized statutory forms; a Missouri-law POA may be accepted in another state but may not include all powers available under the new state’s law
- Community property vs. common law states — moving to or from a community property state (Arizona, California, Nevada, Texas, Washington, and others) has significant implications for how marital property is owned and how it passes at death
- State estate tax implications — Missouri has no state estate tax, but many states do (Oregon, Massachusetts, Hawaii, and others have lower exemptions than the federal threshold); a move to a state with a state estate tax may require restructuring
- Real estate in multiple states — property owned in another state after a Missouri trust is created needs to be evaluated for transfer into the trust under that state’s laws, and may require local counsel to prepare the deed
A stale estate plan creates the illusion of protection without the reality. Families who haven’t reviewed their plans in years often believe they are covered — their documents exist, they’re filed away, everything is handled. But the guardian nominated is no longer available. The trust hasn’t been updated since the children were born and doesn’t reflect how the parents now want the inheritance managed. Three accounts were opened outside the trust. A refinance removed the house from the trust and no one re-deeded it back.
The problem surfaces at exactly the wrong time — at death or incapacity, when nothing can be corrected. A periodic review costs a fraction of the legal and emotional cost of administering an outdated plan.
Events That Require an Immediate Update — Don’t Wait for the 3–5 Year Window
The 3–5 year review cadence is a minimum. These specific events should trigger an immediate plan review, regardless of when the last review occurred:
Self-Audit Checklist — How Stale Is Your Plan?
Use this checklist to assess whether your estate plan needs a review. Any “yes” answer in the flag categories warrants a consultation:
Frequently Asked Questions
When Did You Last Review Your Estate Plan?
If it’s been more than three years — or if any of the triggering events above apply to your family — your plan may have gaps you aren’t aware of. TrustFully.law offers comprehensive estate plan reviews for existing plans, identifying and correcting outdated provisions, funding gaps, beneficiary designation mismatches, and fiduciary nominations that no longer reflect your current wishes. Serving the Greater St. Louis Area and all of Missouri.
Schedule Your Free Estate Plan Review →This article is provided for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. Tax law references (including federal estate tax exemption amounts) are based on law in effect at the time of publication and are subject to change. SECURE Act and SECURE 2.0 summaries are general in nature; the impact on specific plans depends on individual circumstances. You should consult a qualified Missouri estate planning attorney and tax advisor regarding your specific situation. The choice of a lawyer is an important decision and should not be solely based upon advertising.

Comments are closed